Do you actually own the shares in your app?
You tapped a button, the money left your account, and the app now says you own three shares of something. You probably do, in the way that matters most. But if you go and look at the company's own list of owners, your name is not on it. Somebody else's is. That is not a scandal and it is not a secret: it is written in your app's own help pages. Almost nobody reads them.
You are the beneficial owner. The shares are yours, the profit and the loss are yours, and the firm cannot use them to pay its own bills. You are not the legal owner. A nominee company is, and it holds your shares in one pot with thousands of other customers'. Every mainstream UK investing app works this way, and so does almost every pension you will ever have.
Your app already told you this
Freetrade's help centre answers the question in its own title. "Do I own my shares?" The answer starts: "you own your shares!" and then, two lines later, "These shares are held in a nominee account on your behalf."
Both halves are true. They are just doing different jobs, and the second one is the half nobody quotes.
English law lets ownership split in two. The legal owner is the name on the paperwork, the one the company writes to and counts as a shareholder. The beneficial owner is the one the thing is actually for: the one who gets the dividends, the gains and the losses. Normally these are the same person. In a trust, and in an investing app, they are not.
Think of a cloakroom. You hand in your coat and you get a ticket. The coat is yours: nobody disputes that. But the coat is now on a rail that belongs to the cloakroom, hanging next to four hundred coats that look exactly like it, and what makes it yours is the ticket and the cloakroom's records. That is a nominee account. It works. It is also not the same as having the coat on.
The chain of names
Between you and the company you think you own a piece of, there are several links. Your name appears at exactly one of them.
CREST is the electronic system where UK share holdings are settled and recorded. It is run by Euroclear UK & International, which describes itself as the central securities depository for the UK. Paper certificates have been the exception rather than the rule since 2002.
A pot, not a box
Your shares are not sitting in a numbered drawer with your name on it. They are pooled. ShareSoc, the UK individual shareholders' society, puts it plainly: shares held for you in a nominee account are "typically pooled and there will be one entry in the register for all of them, in the stockbroker's name", and most such accounts have "no clear identification of individual holdings".
So what you own is a share of the pot, sized by the records. That is not a trick. It is how you get to buy a third of a share for £5 with no paperwork and no fee. The convenience and the pooling are the same fact.
But it does mean the records are the ownership. Which is fine, right up until somebody has to go through them.
What happens if the app goes bust
Two things protect you, and they are worth knowing separately.
First, your assets are not the firm's. UK rules require a firm to keep client investments apart from its own, precisely so that the people it owes money to cannot take them. Your shares are not part of the pile a failed firm's creditors get to argue over.
Second, the compensation scheme. If there is a shortfall, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme covers investments up to £85,000 per person, per firm, for firms that failed on or after 1 April 2019.
Cash in a bank: £120,000. That is the deposit limit, and it went up from £85,000 on 1 December 2025.
Investments with a broker or an app: £85,000. That one did not move.
Same scheme, different limits, because they are covering different things. If you read an article that gives one number for both, it is out of date or it is wrong.
What neither of those protects you from is time. When a firm holding client assets collapses, an administrator has to reconstruct who owned what from the firm's own records, and the cost of doing that work comes out of the pooled assets. ShareSoc's summary of the experience is blunt: "It sometimes takes years to sort out who owns what, with some shortfalls also common."
You would very probably get your shares. You would not get them on Tuesday.
Your shares might be out on loan right now
Several apps offer to pay you a bit of interest for letting them lend your shares out. Somebody borrowing shares is usually betting the price will fall. That is a normal part of how markets work, and you are allowed to want no part of it.
Trading 212's own help pages set out the deal: "You will receive collateral of at least 102% of the value of the lent shares", and that collateral "will be adjusted daily to match the value of the shares".
Back to the cloakroom. Someone borrows your coat, and leaves a deposit worth a bit more than the coat, topped up every single day. If they never come back, the deposit gets sold and you get a coat. The thing you have taken on is the risk in that last sentence, and the price you were paid for taking it on is the interest.
Whether that is a fair trade is not the point of this page. The point is that it is a trade, it is usually optional, and a lot of people have it switched on without having decided anything.
The vote is the bit you quietly lose
Because the register has the nominee's name on it, the company does not know you exist. ShareSoc again: "The company will therefore not know you and will not recognise you as a shareholder." No notice of the annual meeting, no ballot, no automatic right to turn up.
In 2013 an English court decided the point head on. In Eckerle v Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH, investors who held their shares through a CREST nominee tried to use a right that the Companies Act gives to a company's members. The court held they were not members. The nominee was.
This is not a fringe complaint. In November 2020 the Law Commission, the body that reviews the law of England and Wales for Parliament, published a paper on exactly this. Its title is the question this page is asking: "Intermediated securities: who owns your shares?" It found real difficulty for investors exercising rights such as voting, and gaps in protection when an intermediary gets into trouble. It set out possible fixes and left them with government. Nothing has replaced the system since.
America has the same plumbing, and a name for it
If you hold American shares, the same structure applies with different words. The US regulator's own investor bulletin describes three ways to hold shares. The ordinary one is called "street name", and it means the shares "are registered on the issuer's books in the name of an intermediary" while "your broker-dealer will maintain records showing you as the real or 'beneficial' owner."
That intermediary is usually a company called Cede & Co, which exists inside the Depository Trust Company. American commercial law gives the thing you hold a name of its own: a security entitlement. It is a claim on your broker for your share of the pot, rather than a claim on any particular share.
The book that made a lot of people ask this question
In 2023 a former hedge fund manager called David Rogers Webb published a short book called The Great Taking and gave it away free. Its argument is that the security entitlement was not an accident of convenience but a deliberate construction, and that in a large enough collapse the secured creditors of the firms in the middle would take client assets, worldwide, ahead of the people who paid for them.
Here is the useful way to hold it.
The plumbing he describes is real, and you have just read a page about it. You do not have to take a book's word for any of the structure. The Law Commission published a paper on it. The US regulator publishes a bulletin about it. Your own app's help centre says it. That part is not a theory, it is the system, and almost nobody is taught it.
The plan is a different kind of claim. That the structure exists is documented. That it was built in order to be used that way, on purpose, by people acting together, is not something anyone can hand you a document for. A pipe that could carry something is not proof that somebody intends to pour it down there. This site does not print things it cannot source, and it is not going to start.
So read the book if you want to. Then go and check how your own money is held, which is a thing you can actually do this afternoon. Being able to describe the system out loud is worth more than either believing or dismissing a book about it.
Take the paper certificate away and what you own is a line in a database, backed by a chain of other databases, held together by rules that say a firm may not treat your assets as its own.
That works. It works almost all of the time, which is why it is normal. But it means the thing protecting you is bookkeeping and law, not possession.
Most people think they have possession. What they have is a very good claim. Those are not the same thing, and the difference only ever shows up on the worst day.
- Find your nominee company by name. It is in your app's terms, usually something like "Somebody Nominees Limited". Five minutes. It is the name that is on the register instead of yours.
- Search your app's help centre for the word "nominee". Read what it says in its own words rather than anyone else's.
- Check whether share lending is switched on for you, what you get paid for it, and how to turn it off. It is usually a toggle.
- Check whether your app passes votes on to you. Some now do. Most still do not. One email finds out.
- Check which company actually holds your money, and whether it shares an authorisation with another brand. The compensation limit is per firm, not per app name.
- Read one company's annual report and find the substantial shareholdings note. You will see nominee names, not people. That is the whole page in one screenshot.
Freetrade help centre, "Do I own my shares?", for the beneficial owner wording and the nominee account: help.freetrade.io. Quoted because it is one firm describing its own arrangement in public. Read on 27 August 2026.
Law Commission, "Intermediated securities: who owns your shares? A scoping paper", published 11 November 2020: lawcom.gov.uk. The official review of this exact question.
US Securities and Exchange Commission, "Investor Bulletin: Holding Your Securities", for street name registration and Cede & Co: investor.gov.
Financial Services Compensation Scheme, for both limits: investments, £85,000 per person per firm for firms failing on or after 1 April 2019, and deposits, £120,000 since 1 December 2025.
Trading 212 help centre, "What are the risks associated with Share Lending?", for the 102% collateral adjusted daily: helpcentre.trading212.com. Read on 27 August 2026.
Euroclear UK & International, describing itself as the central securities depository for the UK and the operator of CREST: euroclear.com.
ShareSoc investor academy, "Nominee accounts", for pooling, the share register and what happens in administration: sharesoc.org. ShareSoc campaigns for individual shareholders, so it is an interested party. Its description of the mechanics matches the official sources above.
Eckerle v Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH [2013] EWHC 68 (Ch), for beneficial holders behind a nominee not counting as members. Search the citation and read the judgment.
The Great Taking, David Rogers Webb, 2023, free at thegreattaking.com. Listed so you can read it and judge it yourself. It is the reason a lot of people started asking this question. It is not the source for anything stated on this page.
Questions people ask
So do I own my shares or not?
Yes, in the sense that matters day to day. You are the beneficial owner: the value is yours, the firm cannot spend it, and if it fails the shares are not part of what its creditors fight over. What you do not have is your name on the company's register. The legal owner is a nominee company.
What happens to my shares if my investing app goes bust?
Client investments are kept apart from the firm's own money, so they are not available to its creditors. An administrator works out who owned what and returns it, which can take a long time and costs money that comes out of the pooled assets. If there is a shortfall, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme covers investments up to £85,000 per person per firm.
Can my app lend out my shares without telling me?
Share lending has to be agreed, and it is normally a setting you can see and switch off. Trading 212, for example, publishes that lent shares are backed by collateral of at least 102% of their value, adjusted daily. Check your own account rather than assuming, because plenty of people have it on without having thought about it.
Why can't I vote at the company's annual meeting?
Because the company's register has the nominee's name on it, not yours, so as far as the company is concerned you are not a shareholder. An English court confirmed the point in 2013 in Eckerle v Wickeder Westfalenstahl. Some apps now pass votes through to customers. Ask yours.
Is The Great Taking true?
The structure it describes is real and you can check it in official sources: the Law Commission's 2020 paper, the US regulator's own investor bulletin, and your app's help pages. The further claim, that this was built as a deliberate plan to seize client assets in an engineered collapse, is not something anyone can evidence, and this site does not print claims it cannot source. Read the book, then go and check how your own money is held.
Can I get the shares in my own name instead?
In the UK it is possible through a personal CREST account, where your name goes on the register. A small number of brokers still offer them, sometimes for a fee, and they do not work with most low cost apps. For most people the honest answer is that the nominee system is the price of cheap, instant, fractional investing.
Read next
- Rabbit holeWho actually owns the banks?
- Rabbit holeWhere money hides
- The siteReceipts: our method and our red lines
Last checked 27 August 2026.